Providing Information: That You May Not Know.
STUDENT LOANS
UNLAWFUL DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES UNDER THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT INVOLVING CHARGED-OFF STUDENT LOAN ACCOUNTS
Here is verified, real Federal Case Law where defendants (consumers) prevailed—or where courts barred or constrained third-party debt collectors—in the specific context of student loans, charged-off accounts, and FDCPA / enforceability failures. I am giving you controlling and persuasive authority that courts actually rely on when a collector attempts to collect a charged-off student loan without lawful standing or with misrepresentation.
THERE YOU WILL FIND THE INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE TO GET STARTED.
==================================/
--OPT-OUT LETTERS TO SEND TO THE SCHOOL BOARD
=============================================/
Read First: Everything you need to know when CPS comes knocking.
=============================================
Were Your Children Kidnapped by Child Protective Services?
This may be One Legal Way to Get Them BACK Without a Lawyer.
Start here with this Questionnaire; then draft a TITLE 42 USC § 1983 and § 1985 Federal Civil Rights Case to challenge jurisdiction and civil rights action arising from the warrantless seizure of your children, the fabrication and omission of evidence, and the systematic denial of due process, culminating in the termination of your parental rights. While CPS Agents, The Prosecutor, and other court officers acting individually and in concert, deprived Parents of rights secured by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and conspired to do so in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).
TITLE 42 USC § 1983 and § 1985 statutes allow individuals to sue for civil rights violations.
--FACT SHEET
Intentionally accessible to non-lawyers, while remaining accurate and precise.
Federal Civil Rights Case Arising From Warrantless Child Seizure and Termination of Parental Rights
CASE OVERVIEW
This federal civil rights action arises from the warrantless seizure of minor children, the fabrication and omission of evidence, and the systematic denial of due process, culminating in the termination of parental rights.
The case alleges that Child Protective Services (CPS) agents, law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and court-appointed actors, acting individually and in concert, violated clearly established constitutional rights protected by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
The action is brought under Title 42 of the United States Code, §§ 1983 and 1985, which provide remedies when state actors deprive individuals of federally protected rights.
CORE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES
This case centers on three fundamental constitutional protections:
1. Fourth Amendment — Freedom From Unreasonable Seizure
Parents and children have the right to be free from warrantless government seizure absent true emergency circumstances. The case alleges that children were removed without a warrant and without exigent circumstances, in violation of long-established constitutional law.
2. Fourteenth Amendment — Due Process of Law
Parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and companionship of their children. The case alleges deprivation of that interest without meaningful notice, fair hearings, or evidentiary safeguards.
3. Equal Protection and Civil Rights Conspiracy
The case alleges coordinated action among multiple state actors to deprive parents of equal protection and equal privileges under the law, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).
KEY ALLEGATIONS (FACTUAL SUMMARY)
According to the pleadings:
- Children were seized without a warrant and without documented exigent circumstances
- Government actors relied on unverified or anonymous allegations
- No contemporaneous evidence of abuse or imminent danger was documented
- Evidence favorable to the parents was omitted or withheld
- False or misleading statements were used to justify continued custody
- Parents were denied meaningful opportunities to:Present evidence
- o Call witnesses
- o Cross-examine adverse claims
Judicial proceedings relied heavily on hearsay and post-hoc justifications
- Records and transcripts were sealed or withheld, obstructing review
- The process culminated in termination of parental rights without full constitutional safeguards
WHO IS ALLEGED TO BE RESPONSIBLE
The action names individual actors, not abstract institutions, including:
• CPS / child-welfare agents• Law enforcement officers
• Prosecutorial and court-related officials
• Court-appointed actors (such as guardians ad litem)
• Supervisory officials alleged to have enabled or ratified the conduct
All defendants are sued in their individual capacities for actions taken under color of state law.
LEGAL BASIS FOR THE CASE
42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides a civil remedy when a person acting under color of state law deprives another of rights secured by the Constitution or federal law.
42 U.S.C. § 1985() provides a remedy where two or more persons conspire to deprive an individual of equal protection of the laws or equal privileges and immunities.
These statutes exist precisely to address systemic abuse of governmental power, even when such abuse occurs within child-welfare or court systems.
WHY THIS CASE MATTERS
This case is not solely about one family. It raises broader concerns about:
- The use of emergency powers without true emergencies
- The erosion of procedural safeguards in child-welfare cases
- The difficulty parents face in challenging state action once records are sealed
• The accountability of individual officials who act outside constitutional limits
Federal civil rights law exists to ensure that no government system is above the Constitution, even when acting under the banner of child protection.
RELIEF SOUGHT
The action seeks:
- Declaratory relief that constitutional violations occurred
- Compensatory damages for loss of liberty and family integrity
- Punitive damages to deter future misconduct
- Injunctive relief to address ongoing violations and record practices
- Costs and statutory remedies authorized under federal law
STATUS
The case is proceeding as a federal civil rights action challenging unconstitutional conduct and conspiracy under TITLE 42. All factual allegations are subject to judicial review and adjudication under established federal standards.
IMPORTANT NOTE
This fact sheet summarizes allegations and legal claims asserted in
federal court. All defendants are presumed entitled to due process, and
the matter will be resolved through judicial proceedings.
If you want, I can Convert this into a Federal Case using your Questionnaire.
See Also: List of Federal Cases in Which Parents Have Prevailed
=============================================
=====================================/
Your Mother, a woman, a living soul, created by God, of flesh and blood, very much alive; went into the "foundling" (a safe place to abandon a child) hospital believing she would get care but instead was falsely declared indigent, a pauper. Important: See Full Report Here
The Birth Certificate is An Unrevealed Trust Instrument
The Birth Certificate Bond Explained.pdf
Birth Certificate; TITLE Created By State
YOUR IDENTITY; YOUR CITIZENSHIP
Tues. 17 June 2025:
What if everything you believed about your identity — your citizenship, your finances, even your legal existence — was engineered to benefit someone else?
The truth is surfacing: from the moment you were born, you became a financial asset. Not to your benefit, but to theirs.
THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCAM EXPOSED
In 1933, under the Emergency Banking Act, the U.S. government — and many others soon after — secretly collateralized every newborn’s birth certificate as a bond. That’s right: you weren’t registered as a sovereign being, but as corporate property. Your name was written in all capital letters — a legal fiction known as the “strawman” — and then monetized through the U.S. Treasury via the Cestui Que Vie Trust.
This trust is hidden behind banking codes, tied to CUSIP numbers, and traded globally as part of a silent human capital market. You became a stock. Your life’s work, your energy, your labor — all fed into a system you didn’t even know existed.
BUT THAT SYSTEM IS NOW BEING TERMINATED. Under NESARA/GESARA and the activation of the Quantum Financial System, the entire corporate fiction model is collapsing.
Here’s what’s changing:
Birth certificates are being de-registered as bonds. You are no longer collateral.
All hidden trusts created in your name are being audited by QFS guardianship nodes.
Your sovereign status is being restored through biometric registration in QFS.
Debt instruments (mortgages, student loans, medical debt) tied to your strawman are being reversed.
The IRS — which functioned as a collection agency for international bankers — is being dismantled and replaced by automated flat-tax systems on non-essential goods.
WHY THE VATICAN IS SILENT
Because the Vatican was the holder of the original global trust system. Since 1302, Papal Bulls gave the Holy See ownership of all land, souls, and flesh under the Unum Sanctam doctrine. These powers were expanded under maritime law and hidden in secret financial covenants — until now.
With the Vatican Bank seized, the BIS realigned, and the Global Collateral Accounts unlocked, the stranglehold is over.
The QFS doesn’t recognize fraud-based money. If your wealth was extracted via illegitimate means, it is being corrected. And those corrections will appear in your QFS wallet in stages, based on your age, trust level, and biometric match.
THE END OF THE HUMAN FARM
They farmed your identity. They printed money using your energy. They traded your life without consent.
But with the rise of Rainbow Treasury Notes, gold-backed sovereign wallets, and verified human status protocols, we are returning to lawful value — earned, not stolen.
We are not entering a new economy. We are returning to a real one — built on truth, transparency, and the intrinsic value of the human spirit.
Watch the banks. Watch the legal codes. Watch the quiet disappearance of the old structures.
And then look within — because your value was always there. They just lied about it. But now… we’re taking it back.
--YOUTUBE VIDEO
The Creation of the Birth Certificate Trust
Who is the beneficiary of the original STRAWMAN trust? The beneficiary changes each time a new trust is created. You are the original beneficiary though, If you choose to use your beneficial interest. If you choose not to use it, the citizens of the state that created it are the beneficiaries. This is part of the Highest and Best Use principle. If the property is not being put to its highest and best use, it can be “borrowed” for a time and put to better use. You have not been using it. You have not filed any claims against it, so why should it just sit there not being used? This first trust was created for your benefit, it you choose to use it. Remember, the reason the first party (creator) creates a trust, is for the second party (trustee) to manage the trust corpus for the benefit of a third party (beneficiary).
The original STRAWMAN trust, Mom was the Exchanger / Trustor / Settlor
The REPUDIATION process; correcting your status.
-- Win Your Court Case:
Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust.pdf
-- Payment Bond, Performance Bond, and Bid Bond
Payment Bond, Performance Bond, and Bid Bond
-- About Subrogation
What is Subrogation?
The substitution of one thing for another, or of one person into the place of another with respect to rights, claims, or securities. Subrogation denotes the putting a third person who has paid a debt in the place of the creditor to whom he has paid it, so as that he may exercise against the debtor all the rights which the creditor, if unpaid, might have done. The equity by which a person who is secondarily liable for a debt, and has paid it, is put in the place of the creditor, so as to entitle to make use of all the securities and remedies possessed by the creditor, in order to enforce the right of exoneration as against the principal debtor, or of contribution against others who are liable in the same rank as himself.
See Also: Subrogation
See Also: Subrogation of Your Rights.html
Facts You May Not Know
Our Relationship To Government
Hamdan Brief for US common law of war.pdf
The Use of a UCC-1 Financing Statement
Legal Way to Discharge Debt Without AFV/RFV
Why You Should Never Hire An Attorney
American Bar Association and Lawyers:
Free Men want the Bar Association to be abolished, and the Commercial and Common Law Systems of the United States of America and its Constitution to be totally reinstalled. see: What All Free Men Want
- The Banking Gangsters of the Federal Reserve Bank and the IMF
- The Creators of The Bankruptcy of America,
- The Fraud of the Corporate United States,
- and the NEW WORLD ORDER
-- Stop Foreclosure
under construction
--Collections
Collection-Agencies-and-Your-Rights
--Special Reports For Your Information
You Will Never Win in Their Courts.pdf
Why You Should Never Hire an Attorney.pdf
When a County Clerk Refuses to Record.pdf
Declaration of the People of the United States for Global Peace and Prosperity
2nd Declaration of Independence
The NESARA Law is the most ground breaking reformation to sweep not only the US, but our planet in its entire history. The NESARA act does away with the Federal Reserve Bank, the IRS, the shadow government, and much more. The Global Alliance plans to implement a copy of NESARA called GESARA for the peoples of the world.
Go Here for Complete Information: NESARA/GESARA
The End of the World as We Know it: 17-part series made by Janet Ossebaard: " - The Fall of the Cabal."
--NOTICE: MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH ON TITLE 18
My research has uncovered a significant error in the criminal code.
The federal TITLE 18 criminal code was codified in 1909, again in 1940, and again in 1948. In 1909 and 1940 the jurisdictional section for federal courts only authorized prosecution under TITLE 18 crimes, not under drug crimes or IRS crimes. The 1940 statute, 18 USC §546, was never repealed or amended.
That statute, which is still valid, only authorized prosecution for 1909 TITLE 18 crimes, nothing for U.S.C. United States Code TITLE 21 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL or TITLE 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.
see report here: https://void-judgments.com/prosecution-under-TITLE-18-crimes.htm
CUSIP SEARCH
Hello! Welcome to NAS CUSIP search service! We are glad you have chosen us
to find your CUSIP number for your specific purpose.
This is a little introduction to what you will receive, what you will need, and the time
frame in which you will receive it.
What is a CUSIP?
CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures, which was
founded in 1964 by the American Bankers Association.
Basically, a CUSIP is a “license plate” for securities, so that all traders, brokers, banks,
and anyone acting in commerce can essentially track the security, wherever it may be.
ALL securities within the United States have a CUSIP. It’s the law.
Consider these numbers:
- Birth Certificates
- Naturalization Papers
- Court Cases (where there are no harmed parties)
- Marriage Certificates
- Loan Numbers
- MIN Numbers
- Registered Mail Numbers
- Bank Account Numbers
- Driver License Numbers
- IRS Liens
- Student Loans
- Many other Liens
- Other Commercial Paper
What do you need to find the CUSIP?
All that is required is to complete the Submission Request Form attached .pdf, providing the name of the person involving the number given, the number, what the number is associated with, and a signature (digital signature is sufficient).
How do you send a Request?
Requests on the Submission Request Form can be made through several methods:
1. Email: crypto3669@gmail.com
2. Mail: NAS, 1800 MINERAL SPRING AVE., SUITE 151 NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI 02904
If you send submissions by US Mail, please be sure to send a return address so that we may send your results by mail.
Verbal submission of numbers is not accepted as it can cause the misinterpretation of numbers/info in the process. We want to give you the very best service, and receiving the request in writing ensures the best results.
In order to win in a Child Protective Services case; we have these remedies available to us.
See Report With Footnotes Here.pdf
======================
The following:
First we need to Create Freedom Documents (especially for court case)
Then we have the following remedies available.
Method 1 Complaint and Application Writ of Quo Warranto. Quo warranto is Latin for "by what warrant” (or authority). A writ of quo warranto is a common law remedy which is used to challenge a person's right to hold a public or corporate office. A state may also use a quo warranto action to revoke a corporation's charter. Bonnie-Straight --Quo-Warranto
Method 2 Get a Court Order Subpoena Duces Tecum. A subpoena duces tecum (meaning 'subpoena for production of evidence') is a court order requiring the person subpoenaed to produce books, documents or other records under his or her control at a specified time/place in a court hearing or a deposition.
In our Child Protective Services cases we serve [in person] the Supreme Court and the Attorney General to get a declaratory judgment and or testify to the lawful enactment and Constitutionality of the Statutes you are being charged with.
--A challenge to a law can argue that a statute is unconstitutional “facially” or “as applied.” A statute is facially unconstitutional when “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.” United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987).
--Constitutional Law refers to rights carved out in the federal and state constitutions. The majority of this body of law has developed from state and federal supreme court rulings, which interpret their respective constitutions and ensure that the laws passed by the legislature do not violate constitutional limits.
See Also:
Nancy Schaefer's speech CPS corruption. (Nancy and her Husband were Murdered)
Bonnie Straight on corrupt judges, suing corrupt courts & failure to train remedy.
8 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law.
For more information: Contact Us