With this report you can see why you should never hire an attorney.
None of these deplorable abuses would be possible if the American attorneys were acting as Americans. This system of things wouldn’t last a week without the full help and determined support of the American Bar Association.
The Constitution of the United States of America is a giant and hugely public commercial contract.
The original organic “Constitution for the united States of America” started out as a “compact” ---an agreement by the several States to indebt themselves to pay for certain enumerated services, and so, it has always been a contract defining the structure, limits, duties, and means of paying for services to be provided by a new level of government.
If the Constitution ever meant anything, the lawyers should be defending it, if not out of patriotism, out of greed; but, as you have begun to suspect, the Constitution no longer means anything because the government it binds no longer exists in a practical sense. The People it was meant to protect have been “redefined” as citizens of another nation calling itself the “UNITED STATES” who are merely represented by corporate personas and otherwise presumed dead, lost at sea.
We, the American People, have all but ceased to exist.
The lawful federal government has been replaced by a corporate imposter for over 150 years, and that corporation has neither the rights nor the obligations of the lawful government. Likewise the corporate entities named after you have neither the rights nor the obligations of a Living Person.
In 1933, the original governments of the 48 States United were also taken over by a corporate coup d'état and the original Constitution that had been honored by the American States up to that point, was replaced by the commercial contract that is in evidence today “The Constitution of the United States of America”.
At first glance, the two documents appear largely the same, except that the original 13th Amendment does not appear in the modern version. The original 13th Amendment outlawed the Bar Association in America.
As a commercial contract, the present version of the Constitution is enforceable only if you knowingly act as an Acceptance Agent and bring suit against the federal corporation under the Uniform Commercial Code as a franchise operator.
How many Americans are prepared to do that?
You don’t know you’re an Acceptance Agent.
You don’t know there is a trust and transmitting utility owned as a franchise by the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico named after you (the STRAWMAN). You don’t know that your lawful government has been replaced at all levels by corporations merely “representing” it. You don’t know that you have a “US vessel” named after you, either.
Here is the simple fact -- you cannot hire an attorney to represent you.
Attorneys always represent the Crown Temple.
They never represent the people who pay them, and who mistakenly assume that because they have hired an attorney and paid him lots of money, his job is to defend them. That is not what “your” attorney has agreed to do.
An attorney’s entire job is to make sure that the Judge doesn’t make an appealable error. His job is to protect the judge. He’s there to make sure that when you are nailed to the cross, it is done in a workman-like fashion, and you pay him for this service.
If you don’t understand that your lawyer’s allegiance is always and only to the Court, you may well be mystified by their suggestions and behavior.
Why are the junior attorneys always bobbing up and down like birds drinking at a fountain? If you are watching senior attorneys perform, what are those strange hand signals about? Why does the judge suddenly jump up from his chair, go into his chamber, and then come back out?
You are watching an ancient ritual. Each person is performing their part, according to their level of initiation. The young lawyers are doing obeisance, the older lawyers are calling their shots, like a game of billiards, and the judge’s little in and out of chambers dance just changed the jurisdiction of the court on you without announcing it in court.
The attorneys practice a very strange religion in which everything is twisted around, redefined, upside down and backwards -- a religion that mirrors everything. Where have we encountered that before?
Naming trusts and transmitting utilities after Living Persons is purely a lawyer’s trick. Calling the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and other Insular States the “United States of America” is typical of their semantic deceits.
An attorney’s use of language is meant to be blasphemous, deceptive, and warped against any true or honest meaning. They have managed to record over 350 different so-called “legal meanings” of “United States of America” alone.
Black is white and up is sideways, an objection isn’t an opposition and a conditional acceptance doesn’t accept anything at all.
The attorneys excuse all this as “tradition” and as “legal meanings of words” but that’s claptrap to hide the obvious.
Attorneys are professional liars. The Crown Temple worships the Father of All Lies. When an attorney tells you that the practice of law is all about finding the truth, they have just told you the biggest lie in their whole kit bag. It’s about finding the truth all right -- and killing it.
Attorneys lie when they have to, and they lie when they don’t have to. They lie just for fun. They lie to make money. They lie for entertainment. They lie as a blood sport. They will happily, gleefully, lie about you, their client, but they will never lie to the judge. That is because they are always working for the judge.
So your lawyer isn’t your lawyer, any more than your bank account belongs to you. The judge works for the Court, the Court works for the Crown Temple, and the Crown Temple belongs to the banks. The lawyer you hired works for the judge. If the judge doesn’t get you, your lawyer already has. It’s impossible for the Bar Association to lose, and equally impossible for you to win.
At the end of the day, when the House counts the chips, the Bar Association always wins, and the only way out of this trap is to never go in.
When you hire an attorney to “represent” you, he is representing you in the same way that the trust and transmitting utility is “representing” you. By hiring a lawyer you are presenting yourself to the Court as a ward of the State, literally as a person who is mentally incompetent to speak for yourself and make your own decisions.
This is what a “General Power of Attorney” does ...it grants your authority to act, to speak, to ask questions, and to make decisions, to your lawyer or to whomever else you grant a General Power of Attorney to. You become bound by their words and deeds. Most of them make a show of asking your permission, but the deal is already cut. Nine times out of ten, there isn’t the least little bit of a question about the outcome when you step into the courtroom with a lawyer by your side, because the lawyer you hired has already signed off on the deal “for” you, and you gave him permission to do this by hiring him.
So you have handed your keys to a perfect stranger who works for the judge who works for the Crown Temple which works for the banks, and the banks are, as it turns out, the ones prosecuting you. You might as well strip naked and lay down.
This isn’t to say that your family attorney knows all that I am telling you. The majority of American attorneys will be shocked and in denial when confronted with this. Many of them have been railroaded and victimized by this system themselves.
The criminality that comes with a National Breach of Trust this incredibly huge is unavoidable.
The corruption that thrives as a result of the government’s own crookedness is like a cancer spreading endlessly through America.
What is Really Happening in the Court?
Here is an example of a typical court scenario when a man participates:
Investigator from ABC agency or a municipal corporation has filed an information with
a prosecuting attorney. On the public side, affidavits are not required. The informant
is not required to sign an affidavit submit it to the attorney to commence a public action
against the individual being investigated. Affidavits were required in equity when someone
wanted to file a claim in court. In admiralty, in the public, affidavits are no longer required.
They have been replaced with what is called an information. An affidavit is signed under
oath. The statements made in an affidavit are the signor’s bond. His word is his
bond. The affidavit formerly bonded the case. Now that there are no affidavits, there are
no bonds to bond cases.
!IMPORTANT! The prosecuting attorney has to decide whether or not to commence an action. The informant may have completed an administrative process (IRS –m 90 day letter, 30 day letter, 10 day letter) for the attorney as the basis for bringing the action. It may not have started an administrative process. Nine times out of ten, the administrative process is not needed, because they are almost sure you will agree (without knowing it) to represent the accused individual (the trust) by volunteering to act as its trustee. The Attorney is going to create a new trust to be the accused on the complaint or indictment. If you go into contempt for defending and not taking responsibility for the new trust, you will either pay with the trust Corpus, OR you will go to jail, and your credit (exemption) will be tapped during the time they are housing and feeding you and giving you medical treatment. The trust corpus might include the balance in a bank Account, a title to real property or a car, or any other public asset.
Corpus: Definition -- [Latin, Body, aggregate, or mass.]
1) Corpus might be used to mean a human body, or a body or group of laws. The term is used often in Civil Law to denote a substantial or positive fact, as opposed to one that is ambiguous. The corpus of a trust is the sum of money or property that is set aside to produce income for a named beneficiary. In the law of estates, the corpus of an estate is the amount of property left when an individual dies. Corpus juris means a body of law or a body of the law. Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.®) is an all-inclusive, multivolume legal encyclopedia.
2) The corpus of a trust is the sum of money or property that is set aside to produce income for a named beneficiary. In the law of estates, the corpus of an estate is the amount of property left when an individual dies.
Creator: The attorney is the creator of the accused trust. It might be JOHN HENRY DOE. Notice that they never put your name on a complaint, indictment, or traffic ticket. Even if it is written in upper case and lower case letters, it is still a FICTION and a trust. We cannot mix public and private.
Trust name: The name of the trust is JOHN HENRY DOE. In the body of the complaint, a reference may be made to JOHN HENRY DOE or JOHN DOE or John Doe. This is how the judgment can be multiplied. These might all be new trusts against which the final judgment can be applied, and for which it is presumed you will volunteer to be the trustee, and through which you will be presumed to be surety. The trust is expected to be the defendant. The question is --- who is the trustee and who is taking responsibility for the trust activities?
Trustor: The attorney is also the trustor. He is putting the trust corpus into the trust. That is the charge. It is a debt (liability) on the public side, and a credit (asset) on the private side. We have always presumed a charge is a bad thing. It is only bad if the man is found in contempt of the process, or of the attorney, or of the judge, or of a number of other possibilities. It is very easy to go into contempt. If you don’t agree to take responsibility, you will be in contempt of our presumed fiduciary duty. Creditors do not go into contempt.
Beneficiary: The beneficiary is the State of ___________, which is also the plaintiff in this case. It is the person that stands to gain from the charges (trust corpus), but it only has the equitable interest in the trust corpus. That way, the beneficiary is not help responsible for bringing a claim without a bond (evidence of a debt). The attorney does it instead. The beneficiary has to hold onto its creditor position, and can’t if it brings unfounded claims. The plaintiff seldom signs the complaint. The attorney’s signature is usually the only one on it.
Trustee: This the trust position that carries all the liability. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to manage this trust property for the benefit of the State of ___________,. It does not, the trustee accepts the responsibility for the losses suffered by the beneficiary, the State. there is no appointed trustee. There is a presumption that there will be a trustee when it is needed. The attorney has the complaint served on the original trust with a name like the accused individual (the defendant trust). Someone has to represent the defendant. At this point the only representative for the trust is its creator, the prosecuting attorney. Which has made a commitment to the beneficiary. Once the charge is signed by the attorney and delivered to someone who might volunteer to be the trustee, the attorney does not even have the option of withdrawing the charge without the defendant’s agreement (Rule of Court). Since the complaint was delivered into your hands, as the presumed trustee and surety, you have to agree to the withdrawal of the charges before they can be withdrawn.
As soon as you hire a good attorney or decide to defend the trust yourself, the liability has moved from the prosecuting attorney to you. The fact that you are defending, all by itself, is a dishonor. Anything other than all-out acceptance is a dishonor. Your dishonor is what gives the prosecuting attorney the energy to bond the case. All cases have to be bonded. Whoever bonds the case is the creditor. Whoever is in dishonor is the debtor. They need you to dishonor the process, the attorneys, or the judge to have the standard script result the standard outcome. If you fail to immediately go into dishonor, there will be plenty of opportunities in the script for you to carry out the plot to get you into dishonor. You can plead Not Guilty, testify, defend, call witnesses, question witnesses, file motions, file a counter suit, answer questions, or not respond at all --- just to name a few ways to volunteer to be the trustee and to be in Honor. Your voluntary dishonor will authorize the use of your credit to bond the case. Since you did not voluntarily bond the case, you are in dishonor.
Surety: Since the standard script will be used for the court event, it is likely the man who has volunteered to be the trustee for the accused trust, will defend the trust. That will guarantee the standard outcome. The defendant will be found guilty and the trust corpus will be liquidated enough to “pay” the judgment debt. If the event involves criminal charges, the man’s body will be jailed so the state can RE-VENUE the man’s credit from private into the public state. This is what keeps the public machine running. REVENUE. The man will be the surety for the judgment debtor once the trust is found guilty.
Plaintiff: State (beneficiary) is the plaintiff and presumed creditor, as long as the man plays by the standard script.
Defendant: The prosecuting attorney needs to have a volunteer to defend the trust, or he will be stuck representing the accused trust himself. He is the defendant, but does not plan on holding the position very long. With the help of the judge and the defense attorney, the prosecuting attorney will be able to pass the liability on to the trust and its representative and surety – you – but you have to go into dishonor for this to happen.
All charges, arguments, and testimony is dangerous in the public court.
Remember it is NOT your court. They can only see FICTIONS, so if you are testifying, you are recognized only as a FICTION as you are a piece of paper, but if you are speaking in the court, the court presumes you are the trustee for the trustor). In that capacity, the judge can talk to you. He is expecting you to breach your fiduciary duties by going into dishonor.
Be careful even with the copyright. If you can bring the copyright into the case without testifying (through third party witnesses), you may be able to stave off a demand for trust property. If you have already given The right to use the now-copyrighted name to a corporation, you cannot revoke it that authorization after the fact. You may have done that by applying for a loan. You gave them the use of the name on the application. You can give the use of the name on a driver’s license application. You are the one who tells what name to put on the license. You can’t come back later and charge them for using the name you previously gave them. If there is no driver’s license application, you may be able to give notice of the copyright to the officer, and then enforce the copyright violation because he had notice of your restrictions to use of the name. Even if the car is registered with the State, you may be able to use the copyright in this action, if you know how and do not dishonor your own claim to being the private owner of the name.
Here is a different scenario when the man does NOT participate:
An investigator from ABC agency of a municipal corporation has filed an information
with a prosecuting attorney. Before things get this far, you should have completed
your administrative procedure on the activity that is the subject matter of the
court case. [See: Moving
TITLES in Trust; Claiming and Moving Trusts as a Remedy; Functioning in Commerce]
The prosecuting attorney
has decided to commence an action. The attorney creates a new trust to be the
accused on the complaint or indictment, which is delivered into your hands. This
time you accept the presentment for value, return it, and authorize the use of your
credit, and bond the case. You give notice to the public of these private actions
you have taken. You use third parties to testify to the agreement of the parties of
the dishonor of the plaintiff, if necessary. You do not get involved in the issues of the
case other than the agreement of the parties. You can bond the case. You do not have
to be the trustee and represent the accused trust to take responsibility for the
presumed violations of the State’s statutes. You are one of the people.
You are a creditor with priority over FICTIONS. You are the One – the One who
has the power to create a Win Win situation for all parties.
Creator: The prosecuting attorney is still the creator.
Trust name: The name of the trust is still JOHN HENRY DOE.
Trustor: The prosecuting attorney is still putting the charge into the trust as a corpus.
Beneficiary: The beneficiary is still the State of ___________.
Trustee: Since you have not volunteered to be the trustee, the prosecuting attorney is still the responsible party. You are the one who accepted delivery of the complaint that was sent to the trust over which you are presumed to be the trustee. If you can stay in honor while you take on the obligations of the trust, by using your exemption and your credit as surety for the trust, you will be fine. You can argue with the attorneys and the judge and the witnesses and the clerk, showing how bad a trustee you are. Or You can accept the State’s request for revenue and authorize the use of your exemption (credit).
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. http://articleatlas.com/matthew-15-25.html
It is your choice.
Surety: The suretyship on this case can be shared. Suretyship is a voluntary act. You can volunteer to be the surety using your exemption (credit). Someone else can volunteer to dishonor someone or to dishonor the process, Thereby becoming the surety. Free will is always a factor here. The big question is --- who will be the Surety?
Plaintiff: Whoever bonds the case is the plaintiff. Charges cannot be brought unless there is a bond. If the man supplies the bond, the man is the creditor. The tables can turn. You can do a counterclaim by removing the case into another court for judicial review of your administrative process and get an estoppel on their case.
Or you can express the Trust, where you become the Grantor/Beneficiary instead of the debtor/creditor Trustee in Breach of the Trust See: http://articleatlas.com/learn-to-express-the-trust.html
Defendant: The prosecuting attorney is the defendant, unless there is a defense attorney who has put a notice of appearance into the case. If, so, then the defense attorney is the defendant. As the creditor, you can authorize the prosecuting attorney or defense attorney if he has filed his notice of appearance, to write the check to Settle the account. The check is backed by your bond.
Bond: In every case a bond represents debt – its holder is a creditor of the corporation and not a part owner as is the shareholder. The word “bond” is sometimes used more broadly to refer also to as unsecured debt instruments. See the full report here: Creditors and Their Bonds.pdf
====================
See Also: You will Never Win in Their Courts http://articleatlas.com/you-will-never-win-in-their-courts06.pdf
See this: An Expose' On the Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans The Lawyers Secret Oath.pdf
How do you win in their courts without an attorney?
You "Accept the Charges" or "Acknowledge the Debt"
With regard to court cases you win by forming the trust in the private and "Accept the Charges" then go into the private side of the court (Chancery Court) as Beneficiary.
When the law recognizes a trust then there is a trust. When You've made a claim it is a trust, then you have standing to come in and make a claim as the beneficiary and say that the trustee didn't make a payment, or disbursement; a court of equity assumes that the trustee is guilty. Please print and study the following report; "Express the Trust" http://articleatlas.com/learn-to-express-the-trust.html